Vita Vea Requests a Trade

Las Vegas Raiders Discussion.
Born from RF.net ruins, resurrected as RF.com, now arriving at Raiderstation.
The #1 Las Vegas Raiders site on the web!
User avatar
Be_Easy_25
Posts: 5,547
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2015 9:38 pm
Has given High Fives: 39 times
Received High Fives: 117 times

Vita Vea Requests a Trade

Unread post by Be_Easy_25 »

Should we pursue him?
What’s his trade value?
User avatar
Lecomp
Posts: 867
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2020 4:04 pm
Has given High Fives: 14 times
Received High Fives: 41 times

Unread post by Lecomp »

Wouldn't normally be keen to trade for an older vet, but this one is such a natural fit that I'd do it in a heartbeat (subject to cost).

Would love to see this one happen.
These users gave a High Five to the author Lecomp for the post:
MexicanHulk
User avatar
Viper
Posts: 1,804
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2021 1:39 pm
Has given High Fives: 811 times
Received High Fives: 945 times

Unread post by Viper »

Atlasffa wrote: Mon Jul 27, 2026 5:33 pm
Al would find a way to trade Kubiak to them for a few draft picks and some cash. I’m just grateful he didn’t leave the franchise in the hands of his kid, what a disaster that would have been….

No to the trade, we’re not in win now mode. Pretty sure they’re holding another draft next year. Vita can still play but we need to follow the model of getting younger. This has the makings of future regret and dead cap space.
These users gave a High Five to the author Viper for the post (total 2):
raider_kin, Vercingetorix
User avatar
SuperRaider
Posts: 689
Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2024 6:01 am
Location: Belper;UK
Has given High Fives: 61 times
Received High Fives: 196 times

Unread post by SuperRaider »

He be a massive upgrade if the raiders could get him….

Large NT are very few in the NFL
These users gave a High Five to the author SuperRaider for the post:
Rabidraider
User avatar
chucker
Gold JacketThe JudgeBowersFernando
Posts: 17,038
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 7:53 am
Has given High Fives: 2047 times
Received High Fives: 2751 times

Unread post by chucker »

I'd be happy to have him on the team and happy for the Raiders to pay him good money. I don't think this team is in the competitive window where you give up trade compensation to get a 31 year old DT though. I'd pass, even though he would help a bunch this year.
These users gave a High Five to the author chucker for the post (total 3):
Raiders Baby, Hellbound, Sir Raider Duck, OMS
User avatar
Rabidraider
SnakeMan from MarsSeabass
Posts: 2,706
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2023 4:45 pm
Has given High Fives: 1863 times
Received High Fives: 1147 times

Unread post by Rabidraider »

The cap money can be managed. For me the question is draft capitol.

He has a few more years on the tires and would improve the defense by leaps and bounds.

The d line would be top 10.

We always talk about the trenches. He is the trench...

Him on defense and Linderbaum on offense in the same off season is crazy.
These users gave a High Five to the author Rabidraider for the post (total 3):
Opoponax50, chucker, Raider Nation
User avatar
JRaider17
The JudgeFernando
Posts: 12,848
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2013 6:19 pm
Location: New Jersey
Has given High Fives: 5 times
Received High Fives: 304 times

Unread post by JRaider17 »

It would have to be a 3rd round pick at the absolute best, and that might be too high.
These users gave a High Five to the author JRaider17 for the post (total 2):
Rabidraider, Willmark
User avatar
raider_kin
SnakeThe AssassinThe JudgeGhostMad StorkPurple Drank
Posts: 4,298
Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2015 8:01 am
Has given High Fives: 2712 times
Received High Fives: 1165 times

Unread post by raider_kin »

Be_Easy_25 wrote: Tue Jul 28, 2026 1:38 am He’s 31.
That’s a year younger than our current NT.
He makes us better right now.
We aren’t tanking for a QB.
There’s no incentive to lose football games.

Find a way.
Sure, send them a sixth round pick. Pretty sure they won't take it.
User avatar
raider_kin
SnakeThe AssassinThe JudgeGhostMad StorkPurple Drank
Posts: 4,298
Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2015 8:01 am
Has given High Fives: 2712 times
Received High Fives: 1165 times

Unread post by raider_kin »

Rabidraider wrote: Tue Jul 28, 2026 6:11 am
He is the trench...
You win the internet today for this comment. Well done.
These users gave a High Five to the author raider_kin for the post:
Rabidraider
User avatar
Opoponax50
Posts: 5,689
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2020 9:16 am
Has given High Fives: 1111 times
Received High Fives: 569 times

Unread post by Opoponax50 »

Rabidraider wrote: Tue Jul 28, 2026 6:11 am The cap money can be managed. For me the question is draft capitol.

He has a few more years on the tires and would improve the defense by leaps and bounds.

The d line would be top 10.

We always talk about the trenches. He is the trench...

Him on defense and Linderbaum on offense in the same off season is crazy.
It comes down to cap space now and in the future. If we can manage that without screwing the entire plan over, I'd love to have him on the team.
These users gave a High Five to the author Opoponax50 for the post:
Rabidraider
User avatar
Raiders Baby
Posts: 3,120
Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2014 8:54 am
Has given High Fives: 303 times
Received High Fives: 89 times

Unread post by Raiders Baby »

A rule of thumb that I like is, if you give up a first round pick and acquire the player, what number do you think that pick will be?

If you think that after acquiring Vea, we will be a playoff team, and the pick will be in the 20s, it’s a good trade. He got us to the next level, and it’s unlikely pick 20 would have the same immediate impact.

If you think that after acquiring Vea, we will still be a top 10 pick type of team, was it worth it? Not really. Sure, he made us better, but we still weren’t good, and now we missed the opportunity to draft a young potential blue chipper. The blue chipper ultimately moves the needle more on taking this team to the next level, in part because the timeline is more in line with the rest of the team.

Maybe you can justify it if Vea was 27 instead of 32. But at his current age, adding a guy like Vea is only worth it if he can immediately take your team to the next level.

I’m not sure we’re there, so I’d pass unless he somehow becomes much cheaper than expected (I might pull the trigger if we can get him for a 3rd)
These users gave a High Five to the author Raiders Baby for the post (total 3):
Viper, raider_kin, Sir Raider Duck, OMS
User avatar
raiders93
Posts: 5,059
Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2017 9:34 pm
Has given High Fives: 8 times
Received High Fives: 258 times

Unread post by raiders93 »

chucker wrote: Tue Jul 28, 2026 5:54 am I'd be happy to have him on the team and happy for the Raiders to pay him good money. I don't think this team is in the competitive window where you give up trade compensation to get a 31 year old DT though. I'd pass, even though he would help a bunch this year.
He’d definitely fill a need but yes I’d think it would really be contingent on a discount deal. Maybe a 4th and a later pick swap or something along those lines. I don’t think we’re making any block buster moves for a 31 year old nose tackle
These users gave a High Five to the author raiders93 for the post:
Rabidraider
User avatar
Xramfan
Snake3 Mile LyleThe AssassinGhostChuckyMad StorkFernando
Posts: 18,361
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 12:01 pm
Has given High Fives: 836 times
Received High Fives: 1665 times

Unread post by Xramfan »

Be_Easy_25 wrote: Tue Jul 28, 2026 1:38 am He’s 31.
That’s a year younger than our current NT.
He makes us better right now.
We aren’t tanking for a QB.
There’s no incentive to lose football games.

Find a way.
I don’t think anybody would argue anything you say here but I’d ask at what cost? He’s still a bandaid that will need to be replaced shortly so what are you willing to pay?
User avatar
raidersince63
Posts: 2,431
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2024 6:31 am
Has given High Fives: 1458 times
Received High Fives: 1231 times

Unread post by raidersince63 »

Since he's already looking for mo money, I doubt he'd give the Raiders some kind of a special discount and I doubt Tampa would virtually give him away...so I don't see it happening.

Would he fill a hole?...sure. But would it be a logical move for a team in year 1 of a total rebuild? ...No.
These users gave a High Five to the author raidersince63 for the post (total 3):
SkullCrusher, Viper, ELCAraiderfan
User avatar
JRaider17
The JudgeFernando
Posts: 12,848
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2013 6:19 pm
Location: New Jersey
Has given High Fives: 5 times
Received High Fives: 304 times

Unread post by JRaider17 »

Keep in mind, Bucs are currently dealing with a Baker situation as well. Might be tough to keep both.

User avatar
Rabidraider
SnakeMan from MarsSeabass
Posts: 2,706
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2023 4:45 pm
Has given High Fives: 1863 times
Received High Fives: 1147 times

Unread post by Rabidraider »

Opoponax50 wrote: Tue Jul 28, 2026 7:22 am It comes down to cap space now and in the future. If we can manage that without screwing the entire plan over, I'd love to have him on the team.
They just need to be creative with the money. Back load the contract or whatever trick the cap guys do. Every year the space goes up and money comes off the books.

I wonder if they would take a 4th and a player.

We have 55 million of cap space in 2027 without the yearly increase.
These users gave a High Five to the author Rabidraider for the post:
raider_kin
Post Reply