Around the NFL
- LayneStaley
- Posts: 4,427
- Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2018 12:29 pm
- Has given High Fives: 340 times
- Received High Fives: 862 times
Around the NFL
No clue where to post some stuff not necessarily team related but could be? Feel free to delete if this belongs somewhere else.
Maxx and Parsons would be nasty. I probably wouldn’t pay the price though.
Maxx and Parsons would be nasty. I probably wouldn’t pay the price though.
-
Raider Nation
- Posts: 1,792
- Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 5:44 pm
- Location: Arvada, Colorado
- Has given High Fives: 103 times
- Received High Fives: 49 times
“IF” he would have been the second QB off the board in the 2026 draft, that tells me there could be a team that would be willing to give up more than a first in next years draft…
- DanKD
- Posts: 3,657
- Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2015 10:18 pm
- Has given High Fives: 40 times
- Received High Fives: 1397 times
Yes if he had a great season and stayed out of trouble. As it stands with the risk i think round 3 is the most a team will give up and maybe not that. Could be wrong though.
- raidersince63
- Posts: 2,431
- Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2024 6:31 am
- Has given High Fives: 1458 times
- Received High Fives: 1232 times
^^^No thank you...don't need his baggage.
- These users gave a High Five to the author raidersince63 for the post:
- Curay7680
- heavyD
- Posts: 8,675
- Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2015 6:59 am
- Has given High Fives: 179 times
- Received High Fives: 462 times
Why? I don't think even the team is under the illusion that this will be a playoff team in 2026. They patched up the defense but left the OL largely intact which means they are using this season as more of a trial to see what they have with better coaching but clearly they didn't bolster the OL with making the playoffs in mind as they clearly signed Cousins to take the lumps amd spare Mendoza from being shell-shocked in his first year. There's simply verly little upside in bringing in a malcontent player like Diggs (who's on the decline btw) when you are in a rebuilding phase.
- These users gave a High Five to the author heavyD for the post:
- raidersince63
-
Attyla
- Posts: 52,595
- Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
- Has given High Fives: 1236 times
- Received High Fives: 2950 times
You think we should grab a soon to be 33 year old guy who cannot seem to find the endzone?
- raidersince63
- Posts: 2,431
- Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2024 6:31 am
- Has given High Fives: 1458 times
- Received High Fives: 1232 times
Agreed...As you, myself, and others have pointed out, we're not going to be a serious threat for the PS this year anyway...so why sign a player who is not going to put us over the hump?...especially a "what about me" type player like Diggs?heavyD wrote: Fri Jun 19, 2026 5:57 am Why? I don't think even the team is under the illusion that this will be a playoff team in 2026. They patched up the defense but left the OL largely intact which means they are using this season as more of a trial to see what they have with better coaching but clearly they didn't bolster the OL with making the playoffs in mind as they clearly signed Cousins to take the lumps amd spare Mendoza from being shell-shocked in his first year. There's simply verly little upside in bringing in a malcontent player like Diggs (who's on the decline btw) when you are in a rebuilding phase.
-
mstrbass2000
- Posts: 2,129
- Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2026 10:49 am
- Has given High Fives: 770 times
- Received High Fives: 1016 times
I AGREE he is the best remaining wr available, while he is no longer dominant he is still a viable wr1 and can still get open with his route running abilities and shiftiness
-
mstrbass2000
- Posts: 2,129
- Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2026 10:49 am
- Has given High Fives: 770 times
- Received High Fives: 1016 times
yes, i do he would instantly become our wr1 up and down the field plus we have bowers and jeanty,washington for endzone dutiesAttyla wrote: Fri Jun 19, 2026 6:18 am You think we should grab a soon to be 33 year old guy who cannot seem to find the endzone?
-
mstrbass2000
- Posts: 2,129
- Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2026 10:49 am
- Has given High Fives: 770 times
- Received High Fives: 1016 times
misconception on diggs back to back yrs he has put up good numbers while being a team player...on the field he is just fine, off the field dude is a mess with cardi b and that drama trainraidersince63 wrote: Fri Jun 19, 2026 6:21 am Agreed...As you, myself, and others have pointed out, we're not going to be a serious threat for the PS this year anyway...so why sign a player who is not going to put us over the hump?...especially a "what about me" type player like Diggs?
- These users gave a High Five to the author mstrbass2000 for the post:
- Curay7680
-
mstrbass2000
- Posts: 2,129
- Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2026 10:49 am
- Has given High Fives: 770 times
- Received High Fives: 1016 times
steph diggs is still putting up low end wr1 numbers in back to back yrsheavyD wrote: Fri Jun 19, 2026 5:57 am Why? I don't think even the team is under the illusion that this will be a playoff team in 2026. They patched up the defense but left the OL largely intact which means they are using this season as more of a trial to see what they have with better coaching but clearly they didn't bolster the OL with making the playoffs in mind as they clearly signed Cousins to take the lumps amd spare Mendoza from being shell-shocked in his first year. There's simply verly little upside in bringing in a malcontent player like Diggs (who's on the decline btw) when you are in a rebuilding phase.
- raidersince63
- Posts: 2,431
- Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2024 6:31 am
- Has given High Fives: 1458 times
- Received High Fives: 1232 times
Even if he could turn back the clock 5+ years, and even if he wasn't somewhat of an "attention whore", and even if he'd agree to play for much less salary than he will want, and even if he was markedly better than what we already have, and even if he was still a solid #1, which he's not...I still would not want him wearing the Silver and Black.mstrbass2000 wrote: Fri Jun 19, 2026 6:57 am I AGREE he is the best remaining wr available, while he is no longer dominant he is still a viable wr1 and can still get open with his route running abilities and shiftiness
- These users gave a High Five to the author raidersince63 for the post (total 2):
- Curay7680, RunOverByHubbard
- raidersince63
- Posts: 2,431
- Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2024 6:31 am
- Has given High Fives: 1458 times
- Received High Fives: 1232 times
Not at all a misconception...but thanx for accentuating my point.mstrbass2000 wrote: Fri Jun 19, 2026 7:01 am misconception on diggs back to back yrs he has put up good numbers while being a team player...on the field he is just fine, off the field dude is a mess with cardi b and that drama train
-
mstrbass2000
- Posts: 2,129
- Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2026 10:49 am
- Has given High Fives: 770 times
- Received High Fives: 1016 times
dude caught 85 of 102 targets put up over 1000 yds and caught 4 tds last yr, the yr before he was putting up great numbers and emerging as the wr1 in houston before getting injured and missing the rest of the yr
steph diggs is still performing very well
steph diggs is still performing very well
-
mstrbass2000
- Posts: 2,129
- Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2026 10:49 am
- Has given High Fives: 770 times
- Received High Fives: 1016 times
he clear and free from that mess now...no longer with cardi b and was cleared of all charges tooraidersince63 wrote: Fri Jun 19, 2026 7:08 am Not at all a misconception...but thanx for accentuating my point.