Free Agency thread for Raiders and league-wide

Las Vegas Raiders Discussion.
Born from RF.net ruins, resurrected as RF.com, now arriving at Raiderstation.
The #1 Las Vegas Raiders site on the web!
User avatar
RunOverByHubbard
Posts: 13,329
Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2013 9:09 am
Location: 88 miles NE of the Coliseum
Has given High Fives: 135 times
Received High Fives: 727 times

Free Agency thread for Raiders and league-wide

Unread post by RunOverByHubbard »

Free agency opens March 11. CBS Sports has their top 50 ranking. No Raiders on the list. I am surprised at a couple rated high - Aaron Rodgers and Daniel Jones. Lots of wide receivers

https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/earl ... ng-top-50/
User avatar
raider_kin
SnakeThe AssassinThe JudgeGhostMad StorkPurple Drank
Posts: 4,294
Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2015 8:01 am
Has given High Fives: 2709 times
Received High Fives: 1171 times

Unread post by raider_kin »

BoKnows81 wrote: Sat Mar 14, 2026 3:56 amHard pass.
If any team followed ESPN's advice all the way they would go 0-17; so many bad takes.
These users gave a High Five to the author raider_kin for the post (total 2):
BoKnows81, RI RAIDER
User avatar
chucker
Gold JacketThe JudgeBowersFernando
Posts: 17,035
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 7:53 am
Has given High Fives: 2042 times
Received High Fives: 2751 times

Unread post by chucker »

These users gave a High Five to the author chucker for the post:
mstrbass2000
User avatar
Goodtimes333
Posts: 1,328
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2023 12:04 pm
Has given High Fives: 1769 times
Received High Fives: 681 times

Unread post by Goodtimes333 »

Linderbaum going with his Iowa number
These users gave a High Five to the author Goodtimes333 for the post:
raider_kin
User avatar
Viper
Posts: 1,804
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2021 1:39 pm
Has given High Fives: 811 times
Received High Fives: 945 times

Unread post by Viper »

chucker wrote: Fri Mar 13, 2026 6:37 pm Good thought. Yes you can add void years later. But you need the player’s signoff to do that because you’re adding more years to the contract even though he is not obligated to play those years. If void years already exist in the contract then you have the ability to take any portion of his salary above the minimum and spread it out over the life of the contract, including those void years, and you don’t need the player’s approval.

Adding those void years at the outset gives future flexibility.
Are we still on the hook for Wilkins?
User avatar
mstrbass2000
SnakeThe AssassinBo KnowsMad StorkBowersFernandoJeantyMan from Mars
Posts: 2,091
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2026 10:49 am
Has given High Fives: 764 times
Received High Fives: 1006 times

Unread post by mstrbass2000 »

chucker wrote: Sat Mar 14, 2026 7:37 am No need, until after you've made a signing that makes that necessary.
agree...that we have that flexibility to rework max and koltons deal gives us a lot of leverage on adding more players this yr that could elevate this team
User avatar
chucker
Gold JacketThe JudgeBowersFernando
Posts: 17,035
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 7:53 am
Has given High Fives: 2042 times
Received High Fives: 2751 times

Unread post by chucker »

Viper wrote: Sat Mar 14, 2026 9:01 am Are we still on the hook for Wilkins?
There's almost $30 million in dead money factored into the the cap costs this season. The dead money could go up or down based on the outcome of the grievance process. I think someone (Vinnie?) said that the grievance would be heard in May or June. I'd expect that any increase or decrease in dead money would end up as an adjustment to the 2027 cap instead of being reflected this season, but that's my guess and not based on actual information. There's also a chance that the two sides work out a settlement prior to the grievance being adjudicated.
These users gave a High Five to the author chucker for the post:
Viper
User avatar
Goodtimes333
Posts: 1,328
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2023 12:04 pm
Has given High Fives: 1769 times
Received High Fives: 681 times

Unread post by Goodtimes333 »

Viper wrote: Sat Mar 14, 2026 9:01 am Are we still on the hook for Wilkins?
It's in court and theres no concrete details on what happened. I've heard a variety of things, up to and Including grabbing people's cock and dragging his balls on someone's face. Who knows if that's real or not. Seems unlikely. He needed surgery and wouldn't get it. That and/or he bungled his rehab because he wanted to do it outside of the building. Either way the Raiders get something like 50 million in dead cap off the books next year
These users gave a High Five to the author Goodtimes333 for the post (total 2):
RI RAIDER, Viper
User avatar
raiders93
Posts: 5,058
Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2017 9:34 pm
Has given High Fives: 8 times
Received High Fives: 258 times

Unread post by raiders93 »

chucker wrote: Sat Mar 14, 2026 6:49 am I would not go for Jennings. Nailor fills the role that Jennings would fill, and might be as good at it once he gets more opportunities. If we add to the WR room, it has to be a higher ceiling and younger player - in the draft.
Definitely no to Jennings. Overrated, probably expensive and looks like a locker room problem. Deebo would be at the top of my wish list - makes a ton of sense in terms of fit with kubiak being from the shannahan coaching tree. Always been a QB-friendly target in the short game with his YAC ability
User avatar
Jeevo
SnakeMad Stork
Posts: 14,852
Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2017 8:24 am
Location: Canada
Has given High Fives: 416 times
Received High Fives: 795 times

Unread post by Jeevo »

raiders93 wrote: Sat Mar 14, 2026 11:39 am Definitely no to Jennings. Overrated, probably expensive and looks like a locker room problem. Deebo would be at the top of my wish list - makes a ton of sense in terms of fit with kubiak being from the shannahan coaching tree. Always been a QB-friendly target in the short game with his YAC ability
Deebo is as tough as WRs come and I’d love to see him in the silver and black, but I don’t think our timelines match up.
User avatar
mstrbass2000
SnakeThe AssassinBo KnowsMad StorkBowersFernandoJeantyMan from Mars
Posts: 2,091
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2026 10:49 am
Has given High Fives: 764 times
Received High Fives: 1006 times

Unread post by mstrbass2000 »

deebo is still available as a free agent...go get him, dudes a nightmare mismatch for any team
User avatar
raiders93
Posts: 5,058
Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2017 9:34 pm
Has given High Fives: 8 times
Received High Fives: 258 times

Unread post by raiders93 »

Jeevo wrote: Sat Mar 14, 2026 12:04 pm Deebo is as tough as WRs come and I’d love to see him in the silver and black, but I don’t think our timelines match up.
You might be right at least on his end. I think for us though, he might not be part of a 5 year plan but WR seems like a spot where a vet who can come in and give Mendo a go-to target (outside of Brock) would be huge. Even a Keenan Allen (while different stylistically) would fill that need though I doubt he leaves LA.
These users gave a High Five to the author raiders93 for the post:
mstrbass2000
User avatar
Cruisin with Tooz
Posts: 1,709
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2024 11:43 am
Has given High Fives: 223 times
Received High Fives: 493 times

Unread post by Cruisin with Tooz »

If we add a wr in FA, Im looking for a 1 year stopgap on a cheap deal to tide us over to the 2027 draft, where we take our #1 WR in the 1st or 2nd round. Dont need anything extravagant this year, just a reliable floor. Just some more depth to complete with what we already have. Mendoza may not even be starting for the first quarter to third of the season, and when he does get the call, were going to be in a run heavy offense and when he throws, its going to primarily be to Bowers and Jeanty. Keenan Allen would be fine for that role. 8-10 million for 1 year.
User avatar
SkullCrusher
Posts: 12,013
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 4:14 pm
Location: The Nation.
Has given High Fives: 482 times
Received High Fives: 624 times

Unread post by SkullCrusher »

mstrbass2000 wrote: Sat Mar 14, 2026 12:11 pm deebo is still available as a free agent...go get him, dudes a nightmare mismatch for any team
Deebo probably thinks it's still 2021.
These users gave a High Five to the author SkullCrusher for the post:
MexicanHulk
User avatar
raiders93
Posts: 5,058
Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2017 9:34 pm
Has given High Fives: 8 times
Received High Fives: 258 times

Unread post by raiders93 »

Cruisin with Tooz wrote: Sat Mar 14, 2026 12:17 pm If we add a wr in FA, Im looking for a 1 year stopgap on a cheap deal to tide us over to the 2027 draft, where we take our #1 WR in the 1st or 2nd round. Dont need anything extravagant this year, just a reliable floor. Just some more depth to complete with what we already have. Mendoza may not even be starting for the first quarter to third of the season, and when he does get the call, were going to be in a run heavy offense and when he throws, its going to primarily be to Bowers and Jeanty. Keenan Allen would be fine for that role. 8-10 million for 1 year.
It would be shocking if Mendo isn’t starting day 1 imo. We gonna start AOC for 4-6 games to accomplish… what exactly?

Agree on Keenan, I think Deebo fulfils the same idea. We’re not in position to get a young star WR this year, but we can get away with a guy that can reliably get open on 3rd downs and provide some easy, short completions.
User avatar
BoKnows81
Bo Knows
Posts: 7,282
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:36 am
Has given High Fives: 917 times
Received High Fives: 2144 times

Unread post by BoKnows81 »

No more FA WRs. Time to draft one.
These users gave a High Five to the author BoKnows81 for the post:
raider_kin
Post Reply