He's back! Maxx Crosby merged superthread
-
Corleone
- Posts: 20,607
- Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2013 4:37 pm
- Has given High Fives: 164 times
- Received High Fives: 815 times
-
Contact:
Contact Corleone
He's back! Maxx Crosby merged superthread
Tank is full speed ahead!
- These users gave a High Five to the author Corleone for the post:
- tnraidermg
- LayneStaley
- Posts: 4,416
- Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2018 12:29 pm
- Has given High Fives: 340 times
- Received High Fives: 873 times
I’d take less from Bears or Eagles. No f[raiders_icon]cking way would I deal with the Ravens for less.
- These users gave a High Five to the author LayneStaley for the post:
- RickRyb
- DanKD
- Posts: 3,618
- Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2015 10:18 pm
- Has given High Fives: 40 times
- Received High Fives: 1347 times
0% chance we agree to a reduced compensation deal with the Ravens. Absolutely f[raiders_icon]ck them, id never deal with them again
- These users gave a High Five to the author DanKD for the post (total 7):
- Rabidraider, RickRyb, Goodtimes333, LayneStaley, Willmark, Arsenal Raider, Rainman56
- raiders93
- Posts: 5,058
- Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2017 9:34 pm
- Has given High Fives: 8 times
- Received High Fives: 258 times
Source?Jeevo wrote: Tue Mar 10, 2026 7:19 pm Starting to hear some say that it’s a real possibility that the Ravens still acquire him, but for less. Makes sense really.
I’d think the level of bad blood would be insane. What I’d give to be a fly on the wall in spyteks office right now
Why? We were 3-14 with him giving 1000 percent, nobody really fears him.Tatum wrote: Tue Mar 10, 2026 7:20 pm ok ... your take is valid. Yes the Ravens look foolish, very foolish.
at the other side ... Maxx's side ... he's going to give 200% effort no matter what. 200% as a Raven, 200% as a Las Vegas Raider (even if he doesn't want to be a Raider), 200% as a Chiefs player ... he will bring it, as long as he is physically able.
I pity the teams that have to play against him.
-
Jeevo
- Posts: 14,852
- Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2017 8:24 am
- Location: Canada
- Has given High Fives: 416 times
- Received High Fives: 795 times
C’mon, take the best deal. We can figure out how to f[raiders_icon]ck them at a later date.LayneStaley wrote: Tue Mar 10, 2026 7:25 pm I’d take less from Bears or Eagles. No f[raiders_icon]cking way would I deal with the Ravens for less.
- 16 to 88
- Posts: 19,159
- Joined: Thu May 01, 2014 10:23 pm
- Location: Dog House
- Has given High Fives: 414 times
- Received High Fives: 289 times
If we can still afford the Linderbaum contract by hook or by crook and NOW they offer him more money does he go back? If he does that calls to question his character.
-He agreed to a contract already
-THEY traded for Maxx knowing they weren't going to be able to match other teams offers for him
-That in turn means having Maxx Crosby on there team was more important then him
-We wanted him so badly we made him the highest paid center in the NFL by a long shot. Higher than what they were asking for.
Does he now renege on that deal and go back to the team whose priority's were elsewhere? If he does that is a bad look.
-He agreed to a contract already
-THEY traded for Maxx knowing they weren't going to be able to match other teams offers for him
-That in turn means having Maxx Crosby on there team was more important then him
-We wanted him so badly we made him the highest paid center in the NFL by a long shot. Higher than what they were asking for.
Does he now renege on that deal and go back to the team whose priority's were elsewhere? If he does that is a bad look.
- LayneStaley
- Posts: 4,416
- Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2018 12:29 pm
- Has given High Fives: 340 times
- Received High Fives: 873 times
I wish Al was alive for this. He’d be dragging them through the mud.
- These users gave a High Five to the author LayneStaley for the post (total 4):
- Goodtimes333, ALLRAIDERWORLD21, raiderboyron, Owsley Stanley
-
Rabidraider
- Posts: 2,703
- Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2023 4:45 pm
- Has given High Fives: 1865 times
- Received High Fives: 1150 times
DanKD wrote: Tue Mar 10, 2026 7:25 pm 0% chance we agree to a reduced compensation deal with the Ravens. Absolutely f[raiders_icon]ck them, id never deal with them again
If they did, every team would pull this bullshit. f[raiders_icon]ck Ravens. Trade Maxx to someone in the Ravens division.
- DanKD
- Posts: 3,618
- Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2015 10:18 pm
- Has given High Fives: 40 times
- Received High Fives: 1347 times
Mark is weak but Brady has a lot of connections. Ravens may end up regretting this.
- These users gave a High Five to the author DanKD for the post (total 4):
- Rabidraider, LayneStaley, Raiders Baby, ALLRAIDERWORLD21
- raiders93
- Posts: 5,058
- Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2017 9:34 pm
- Has given High Fives: 8 times
- Received High Fives: 258 times
Yeah there is something bigger than pure rationality when it comes to the NFL. Just the same as you don’t trade elite players within your division… I don’t know that you give a discount to a team that just f[raiders_icon]cked you regardless of your other options.DanKD wrote: Tue Mar 10, 2026 7:25 pm 0% chance we agree to a reduced compensation deal with the Ravens. Absolutely f[raiders_icon]ck them, id never deal with them again
- LayneStaley
- Posts: 4,416
- Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2018 12:29 pm
- Has given High Fives: 340 times
- Received High Fives: 873 times
I just don’t see Spytek or Brady letting the Ravens back out on a physical and then ask to pay less for the player when they made it clear they wanted 2 1s. I think Tom is probably in “f[raiders_icon]ck them” mode.Jeevo wrote: Tue Mar 10, 2026 7:25 pm C’mon, take the best deal. We can figure out how to f[raiders_icon]ck them at a later date.
-
Jeevo
- Posts: 14,852
- Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2017 8:24 am
- Location: Canada
- Has given High Fives: 416 times
- Received High Fives: 795 times
Was listening to Tom Telesco on the possibility that Linderbaum backs out. He finds that very unlikely, says agents don’t agree to deals and then back out a day or two later.
- These users gave a High Five to the author Jeevo for the post (total 3):
- Rabidraider, 16 to 88, Steve007
- riseNraid09
- Posts: 1,533
- Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2023 7:46 pm
- Location: The Ville, Ky (BIG BLUE NATION)
- Has given High Fives: 156 times
- Received High Fives: 200 times
I just stumbled on to this news... I couldn't help but laugh. Things were going wayyyy to well. the universe couldn't allow it and had to balance the scales somehow, I guess.
very curious to see how this is navigated... how many of those free agents would have to be sacrificed if Spytek is unable to find a suitable trade partner? One? Two?
very curious to see how this is navigated... how many of those free agents would have to be sacrificed if Spytek is unable to find a suitable trade partner? One? Two?
- These users gave a High Five to the author riseNraid09 for the post (total 2):
- rich72, Raiders Baby
-
Jeevo
- Posts: 14,852
- Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2017 8:24 am
- Location: Canada
- Has given High Fives: 416 times
- Received High Fives: 795 times
You could be right, plus they may just think they can do better by waiting, assuming the hypothetical even exists.LayneStaley wrote: Tue Mar 10, 2026 7:28 pm I just don’t see Spytek or Brady letting the Ravens back out on a physical and then ask to pay less for the player when they made it clear they wanted 2 1s. I think Tom is probably in “f[raiders_icon]ck them” mode.
- These users gave a High Five to the author Jeevo for the post:
- LayneStaley