He's back! Maxx Crosby merged superthread

Las Vegas Raiders Discussion.
Born from RF.net ruins, resurrected as RF.com, now arriving at Raiderstation.
The #1 Las Vegas Raiders site on the web!
User avatar
Corleone
SnakeThe AssassinBo KnowsThe ToozBowersSeabassMan from MarsFernandoJeanty+1+1
Posts: 20,607
Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2013 4:37 pm
Has given High Fives: 164 times
Received High Fives: 815 times
Contact:

He's back! Maxx Crosby merged superthread

Unread post by Corleone »

Tank is full speed ahead!



These users gave a High Five to the author Corleone for the post:
tnraidermg
User avatar
Rabidraider
SnakeMan from MarsSeabass
Posts: 2,707
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2023 4:45 pm
Has given High Fives: 1864 times
Received High Fives: 1148 times

Unread post by Rabidraider »

If Dallas isn't in the picture, my second guess is the Rams. They have no problem dumping picks. Their remaining 1st this year and their 1st next year to start. They are very close to another deep playoff run with KC's corner and then Maxx to finish things off.
User avatar
Nor_Cal_Raider
Posts: 845
Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2013 7:31 am
Has given High Fives: 4 times
Received High Fives: 80 times

Unread post by Nor_Cal_Raider »

He'd be an instant hero going back to Detroit.
User avatar
FLORIDARAYDAH
Posts: 8,127
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 5:38 pm
Has given High Fives: 981 times
Received High Fives: 592 times

Unread post by FLORIDARAYDAH »

SkullCrusher wrote: Thu Mar 05, 2026 11:43 am Here's the simple thought process and it does carry logic with it. This doesn't mean I'm pro or anti Maxx. How I look at it, if we get very solid compensation for Maxx it's a wash to me and we won't really know for probably a couple of years when we look back.

For Max we get 2 high picks + maybe a player for him. The two picks are the youth movement.
We get his replacement in FA for no picks, but cap money at a bit more than what Maxx costs.

How you wrote it, it would seem like were doing a 1:1 trade between those players, yes that would be dumb.
Now I know you know better than that, but that is how you wrote it.
Im saying it's 2 different deals. Get your haul for Maxx.
There is no need to make a stupid move for an older injured player just because we can. I think we have zero interest in Hendrickson and the feeling is mutual. Same as the "get Evans" posts. I hope we are beyond giving old vets a last payday with no return. Unless we are in position to compete those guys are Al moves
These users gave a High Five to the author FLORIDARAYDAH for the post (total 3):
Hellbound, BoKnows81, Trainnvain
User avatar
BoKnows81
Bo Knows
Posts: 7,285
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:36 am
Has given High Fives: 922 times
Received High Fives: 2143 times

Unread post by BoKnows81 »

I hope we don't look back and kick ourselves for not taking the Cowboys (alleged) offer if we dont end up with something better. Bc if it was 12 and 20 this year, that was an overpay in itself and we would of Kickstarted this rebuild the right way.
These users gave a High Five to the author BoKnows81 for the post (total 2):
Rabidraider, RI RAIDER
User avatar
raider_kin
SnakeThe AssassinThe JudgeGhostMad StorkPurple Drank
Posts: 4,304
Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2015 8:01 am
Has given High Fives: 2718 times
Received High Fives: 1168 times

Unread post by raider_kin »

BoKnows81 wrote: Thu Mar 05, 2026 2:11 pm I hope we don't look back and kick ourselves for not taking the Cowboys (alleged) offer of two 1sts if we dont end up with something better. Bc if it was 12 and 20 this year, that was an overpay in itself and we would of Kickstarted this rebuild the right way.
Do we know this was the offer?
User avatar
BotesBoats
Posts: 185
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2024 1:02 pm
Has given High Fives: 45 times
Received High Fives: 99 times

Unread post by BotesBoats »

BoKnows81 wrote: Thu Mar 05, 2026 2:11 pm I hope we don't look back and kick ourselves for not taking the Cowboys (alleged) offer of two 1sts if we dont end up with something better. Bc if it was 12 and 20 this year, that was an overpay in itself and we would of Kickstarted this rebuild the right way.
I'm not convinced they did. A few rumors came out that they weren't willing to part with 2 firsts. Wingo's message on X said it too.

My hope is Cowboys backed out because they DID offer that, or a version of it, maybe a this year and next years first, and got outbid by someoene else.
These users gave a High Five to the author BotesBoats for the post:
Goodtimes333
User avatar
BoKnows81
Bo Knows
Posts: 7,285
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:36 am
Has given High Fives: 922 times
Received High Fives: 2143 times

Unread post by BoKnows81 »

raider_kin wrote: Thu Mar 05, 2026 2:14 pm Do we know this was the offer?
All i'm seeing is it was two 1sts that the Cowboys weren't willing to give. Years werent specified. Thats why I said alleged.

I still would of taken one of their 1sts this year and one next year though. Two 1sts in any way shape or form is enough for me.
These users gave a High Five to the author BoKnows81 for the post (total 2):
Rabidraider, raider_kin
User avatar
Attyla
Gold JacketSnake3 Mile Lyle
Posts: 52,595
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1239 times
Received High Fives: 2977 times

Unread post by Attyla »

BotesBoats wrote: Thu Mar 05, 2026 2:15 pm I'm not convinced they did. A few rumors came out that they weren't willing to part with 2 firsts. Wingo's message on X said it too.

My hope is Cowboys backed out because they DID offer that, or a version of it, maybe a this year and next years first, and got outbid by someoene else.
Well, I said I was done with this, but while I am not going to comment on the back and forth, I will say that Wingo, while not Shefter, has been dialed in the past.
User avatar
Cruisin with Tooz
Posts: 1,713
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2024 11:43 am
Has given High Fives: 223 times
Received High Fives: 496 times

Unread post by Cruisin with Tooz »

BoKnows81 wrote: Thu Mar 05, 2026 2:16 pm All i'm seeing is it was two 1sts that the Cowboys weren't willing to give. Years werent specified. Thats why I said alleged.

I still would of taken one of their 1sts this year and one next year though. Two 1sts in any way shape or form is enough for me.
I would rather have 12 and next year's 1st over 12 and 20. Its worth taking the risk that their 1st next year will be significantly better than 20. There isnt much risk it will be significantly worse than 20.
User avatar
DanKD
Posts: 3,627
Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2015 10:18 pm
Has given High Fives: 40 times
Received High Fives: 1363 times

Unread post by DanKD »

Crosby trade announced by 1pm tomorrow
User avatar
SkullCrusher
Posts: 12,013
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 4:14 pm
Location: The Nation.
Has given High Fives: 483 times
Received High Fives: 624 times

Unread post by SkullCrusher »

FLORIDARAYDAH wrote: Thu Mar 05, 2026 1:46 pm Im saying it's 2 different deals. Get your haul for Maxx.
There is no need to make a stupid move for an older injured player just because we can. I think we have zero interest in Hendrickson and the feeling is mutual. Same as the "get Evans" posts. I hope we are beyond giving old vets a last payday with no return. Unless we are in position to compete those guys are Al moves
Sure if you don't think Trey is the guy. But some will think he's a plausible replacement.
So you could actually replace Maxx with Trey for a period of time and get the picks.
But Dallas is seeing clearer, why give up good picks when you can just sign a pretty good guy for no picks.
These users gave a High Five to the author SkullCrusher for the post:
raider_kin
User avatar
BoKnows81
Bo Knows
Posts: 7,285
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:36 am
Has given High Fives: 922 times
Received High Fives: 2143 times

Unread post by BoKnows81 »

I've said it before and I'll say it again. As crazy as it sounds, the ONLY way I bring Trey here is if we keep Maxx. Make DE an absolute force. In no way am I replacing Maxx for Trey in any way shape or form.
These users gave a High Five to the author BoKnows81 for the post:
FLORIDARAYDAH
User avatar
vtraider
Bo KnowsThe AssassinAC/DCBowersFernandoJeanty
Posts: 8,198
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 9:32 am
Location: Pigeon forge Tennessee
Has given High Fives: 46 times
Received High Fives: 443 times

Unread post by vtraider »

If we are going to bring in an older player and develop a rookie behind them then just bring Mack back
User avatar
Cruisin with Tooz
Posts: 1,713
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2024 11:43 am
Has given High Fives: 223 times
Received High Fives: 496 times

Unread post by Cruisin with Tooz »

DanKD wrote: Thu Mar 05, 2026 3:14 pm Crosby trade announced by 1pm tomorrow
GMT, EST or PST?
User avatar
Cruisin with Tooz
Posts: 1,713
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2024 11:43 am
Has given High Fives: 223 times
Received High Fives: 496 times

Unread post by Cruisin with Tooz »

BoKnows81 wrote: Thu Mar 05, 2026 3:42 pm I've said it before and I'll say it again. As crazy as it sounds, the ONLY way I bring Trey here is if we keep Maxx. Make DE an absolute force. In no way am I replacing Maxx for Trey in any way shape or form.
Wait!!! What??? And based on everything Florida has posted on this, how is he high-5ing it? How is that even possible with 87 million in cap space and like 20 pending FAs? Youd be spending about 55 million on Hendrikson and a C and not getting picks.
Post Reply