The Tankathon thread,i.e., the 2026 Draft

Las Vegas Raiders Discussion.
Born from RF.net ruins, resurrected as RF.com, now arriving at Raiderstation.
The #1 Las Vegas Raiders site on the web!
User avatar
KillerRaider30
Posts: 7,589
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2015 12:24 pm
Has given High Fives: 624 times
Received High Fives: 551 times

The Tankathon thread,i.e., the 2026 Draft

Unread post by KillerRaider30 »

User avatar
ALLRAIDERWORLD21
Posts: 4,105
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2015 10:02 pm
Has given High Fives: 502 times
Received High Fives: 644 times

Unread post by ALLRAIDERWORLD21 »

Attyla wrote: Tue Dec 30, 2025 9:01 am I believe we are securely in the top 2
This is good which also mean a Giants win secures the 1st pick regardless of Chiefs. Of course a tie of wins and losses would mean rotating the top pick every round after the 1st so losing to the Chiefs is still better but I'll take the 1st pick any we can get it.
User avatar
pfish57
Posts: 8,690
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2019 1:57 pm
Has given High Fives: 348 times
Received High Fives: 829 times

Unread post by pfish57 »

Would be nice if the Giants win, and I could actually pull for a win in the last game...especially since the Sloth isn't going to be out there making me ill :sick:
User avatar
BoKnows81
Bo Knows
Posts: 7,285
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:36 am
Has given High Fives: 922 times
Received High Fives: 2143 times

Unread post by BoKnows81 »

pfish57 wrote: Tue Dec 30, 2025 9:45 am Would be nice if the Giants win, and I could actually pull for a win in the last game...especially since the Sloth isn't going to be out there making me ill :sick:
Agreed. I'd love to see us beat Kelce into the ground on his way out. f[raiders_icon]ck him
User avatar
Raider_Dave
Posts: 3,536
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2014 4:22 pm
Has given High Fives: 5 times
Received High Fives: 223 times

Unread post by Raider_Dave »

Cruisin with Tooz wrote: Mon Dec 29, 2025 11:14 pm SF plays Saturday and Cin and NO have early sunday games. We can clinch #1 by the time our game starts even if the Giants lose if SF, Cin and NO have all won.
Wait... are you saying that we can pass the Giants in SOS if we win and they lose? They currently have a .011 lead on us.
Our win and their loss would reduce that lead by .008, leaving them .003 ahead.
So just like the Jets comparison there would be six games to affect SOS, 3 for each team.
Seems like we would need 4 of those 6 games to break our way.
I don't think we could finish in a tie with Giants. They have Cowboys twice on Schedule and they have a Tie on their record, which makes their SOS bit off.
User avatar
Cruisin with Tooz
Posts: 1,713
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2024 11:43 am
Has given High Fives: 223 times
Received High Fives: 496 times

Unread post by Cruisin with Tooz »

Raider_Dave wrote: Tue Dec 30, 2025 9:59 am Wait... are you saying that we can pass the Giants in SOS if we win and they lose? They currently have a .011 lead on us.
Our win and their loss would reduce that lead by .008, leaving them .003 ahead.
So just like the Jets comparison there would be six games to affect SOS, 3 for each team.
Seems like we would need 4 of those 6 games to break our way.
I don't think we could finish in a tie with Giants. They have Cowboys twice on Schedule and they have a Tie on their record, which makes their SOS bit off.
+ tie for GB
User avatar
Raider_Dave
Posts: 3,536
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2014 4:22 pm
Has given High Fives: 5 times
Received High Fives: 223 times

Unread post by Raider_Dave »

Giants: 3 Games that can swing their SOS. These are the 3 teams they played that they didn't play entire division.
Saints @ Falcons
Seattle @ San Fran
Miami @ New England
Teams in bold were on Giants schedule, so we want them to win.

Raiders: these are the 3 teams that we didn't play entire divsion.
Detroit @ Chicago
Cleveland @ Cinn
Miami @ New England
Teams in bold were on Raiders schedule, so we want them to lose.

I see now that the Pats are on both our list, so that game is a wash. Only 4 games to swing SOS, so we need 3 out 4 to go our way.
These users gave a High Five to the author Raider_Dave for the post:
RI RAIDER
User avatar
BoKnows81
Bo Knows
Posts: 7,285
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:36 am
Has given High Fives: 922 times
Received High Fives: 2143 times

Unread post by BoKnows81 »

FB_IMG_1767119756660.jpg
From The Athletic. Can someone confirm if this is correct?
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
Raider_Dave
Posts: 3,536
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2014 4:22 pm
Has given High Fives: 5 times
Received High Fives: 223 times

Unread post by Raider_Dave »

BoKnows81 wrote: Tue Dec 30, 2025 10:36 am FB_IMG_1767119756660.jpg

From The Athletic. Can someone confirm if this is correct?
That seems to confirm exactly what Tooz and myself are saying.
These users gave a High Five to the author Raider_Dave for the post (total 2):
BoKnows81, RI RAIDER
User avatar
WNYRAIDER
Posts: 4,245
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 6:02 am
Has given High Fives: 332 times
Received High Fives: 399 times

Unread post by WNYRAIDER »

DanKD wrote: Tue Dec 30, 2025 9:05 am What's funny is how much we are all worried about these various scenarios while we are probably going to be trounced by 30 points as Kelce demolishes us one last time.

...the reality is that it is too early to discuss 'whats cooking' 5 days out, and other potential topics to choose from are limited.
...I think everyone is in agreement that unless the chiefs were game to throw the game just to screw us on the pick, which I just can't see them debasing themselves to that extent, or Andy letting them, it is just a case of milking what is left to milk before the expected outcome Sunday, is behind us.
User avatar
Raider_Dave
Posts: 3,536
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2014 4:22 pm
Has given High Fives: 5 times
Received High Fives: 223 times

Unread post by Raider_Dave »

I still think this game very winnable.
Our guys are losers and will playing hard out of embarrassment/pride.
Chiefs after winning multiple Super Bowls do not have that issue.
They got smoked by Tenn. Somehow they stayed in the game vs Denver, but look at these stats.
image.png
In no way am I confident they beat us.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
LayneStaley
Posts: 4,417
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2018 12:29 pm
Has given High Fives: 339 times
Received High Fives: 865 times

Unread post by LayneStaley »

If we somehow f[raiders_icon]ck away the number 1 pick on the last week it will be another all time low.
These users gave a High Five to the author LayneStaley for the post:
Willmark
User avatar
RI RAIDER
Posts: 6,330
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 4:34 am
Has given High Fives: 1066 times
Received High Fives: 585 times

Unread post by RI RAIDER »

Thanks Dave. That is correct under the draft simulator. I have been playing with this for a while.
https://www.profootballnetwork.com/nfl- ... -predictor

Plug different options at the bottom of the page.
User avatar
JRaider17
The JudgeFernando
Posts: 12,848
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2013 6:19 pm
Location: New Jersey
Has given High Fives: 5 times
Received High Fives: 304 times

Unread post by JRaider17 »

User avatar
Corleone
SnakeThe AssassinBo KnowsThe ToozBowersSeabassMan from MarsFernandoJeanty+1+1
Posts: 20,607
Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2013 4:37 pm
Has given High Fives: 164 times
Received High Fives: 815 times
Contact:

Unread post by Corleone »

BoKnows81 wrote: Tue Dec 30, 2025 9:32 am If the Giants beat the Cowboys, I hope we beat Kelce into oblivion, literally. Can't stand that dude.
Not me. I want first pick in each round. A win means we have to rotate with the other 3 win teams after round 1. f[raiders_icon]ck that.
These users gave a High Five to the author Corleone for the post (total 3):
Oaktownonly, WolfRaider, ALLRAIDERWORLD21
User avatar
Corleone
SnakeThe AssassinBo KnowsThe ToozBowersSeabassMan from MarsFernandoJeanty+1+1
Posts: 20,607
Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2013 4:37 pm
Has given High Fives: 164 times
Received High Fives: 815 times
Contact:

Unread post by Corleone »

JRaider17 wrote: Tue Dec 30, 2025 11:50 am
Cowboys gonna sit Dak after the first possession aren’t they?
Post Reply