The Tankathon thread,i.e., the 2026 Draft

Las Vegas Raiders Discussion.
Born from RF.net ruins, resurrected as RF.com, now arriving at Raiderstation.
The #1 Las Vegas Raiders site on the web!
User avatar
KillerRaider30
Posts: 7,589
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2015 12:24 pm
Has given High Fives: 624 times
Received High Fives: 551 times

The Tankathon thread,i.e., the 2026 Draft

Unread post by KillerRaider30 »

User avatar
Hellbound
Woodson WhiskeySeabass
Posts: 6,719
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 11:21 am
Has given High Fives: 617 times
Received High Fives: 1033 times

Unread post by Hellbound »

Oaktown Superman wrote: Mon Nov 10, 2025 8:24 am Well, what they’re doing ain’t working. But they need to get a good QB by hook or crook. Looks like the AR 15 experiment didn’t pan out, but gotta give them (Colts) respect for at least grafting him. Raiders draft guys like Ferrell, Leatherwood, Abram, Arnette, who flopped. If they’re gonna flop in the first, at least try to better the QB position.
I get what you're saying and yes kudos for them taking a swing. The thing is, everyone including my wife who doesn't know what a touchdown is, knew Richardson wasn't a qb. He was horrible in college. He had no reason to be drafted before the 5th rd. This isn’t hindsight

Anyways, yes take your swing but don't be absolute idiots about it
These users gave a High Five to the author Hellbound for the post:
rcraider
User avatar
Raiderman4
Posts: 1,683
Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2014 5:19 pm
Received High Fives: 15 times

Unread post by Raiderman4 »

Doesn't really matter. We are f[raiders_icon]cked no matter what happens or what we do
User avatar
RickRyb
The Assassin
Posts: 1,597
Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2019 11:21 am
Location: SoCal
Has given High Fives: 1156 times
Received High Fives: 443 times

Unread post by RickRyb »

Raiders will take a QB with one of their first 3 picks, but I doubt it will be with their 1st round pick.
User avatar
rcraider
Posts: 1,028
Joined: Fri Mar 06, 2015 10:46 pm
Has given High Fives: 374 times
Received High Fives: 273 times

Unread post by rcraider »

Willmark wrote: Mon Nov 10, 2025 8:45 am Correct.

The are smart for realizing that while AR15 is a great athlete he is not a very good QB. Better to recognize that early, stop the bleeding and move on.
Actually i think the Colts screwed that whole thing up. They overdrafted a raw as sushi, badly in need of development QB, than in his 1st season they let him run the ball like he is still playing college football against college kids and he predictably gets injured. So his first season ends up being a wash he gets zero development. Enters his 2nd season still raw, gets hurt again - no development. 3rd season still raw, now looks like a bust. They should have been cautious with him and told him you need to protect yourself when you run the ball your big ass is gonna get lit up if you try to take on NFL players, take the safe yardage.
User avatar
DanKD
Posts: 3,630
Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2015 10:18 pm
Has given High Fives: 39 times
Received High Fives: 1365 times

Unread post by DanKD »

rcraider wrote: Mon Nov 10, 2025 5:25 pm Actually i think the Colts screwed that whole thing up. They overdrafted a raw as sushi, badly in need of development QB, than in his 1st season they let him run the ball like he is still playing college football against college kids and he predictably gets injured. So his first season ends up being a wash he gets zero development. Enters his 2nd season still raw, gets hurt again - no development. 3rd season still raw, now looks like a bust. They should have been cautious with him and told him you need to protect yourself when you run the ball your big ass is gonna get lit up if you try to take on NFL players, take the safe yardage.
This is 100% true. If you were going to take him it had to be with the plan to sit him for two seasons
These users gave a High Five to the author DanKD for the post:
mranquales
User avatar
BoKnows81
Bo Knows
Posts: 7,285
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:36 am
Has given High Fives: 920 times
Received High Fives: 2135 times

Unread post by BoKnows81 »

DanKD wrote: Mon Nov 10, 2025 6:17 pm This is 100% true. If you were going to take him it had to be with the plan to sit him for two seasons
Sit him for two seasons for what? To prolong the sucking? He was never going to be a good QB. I give the Colts props for correcting that disaster rather quickly.
These users gave a High Five to the author BoKnows81 for the post:
Raidernation1979
User avatar
Willmark
Posts: 14,802
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2013 2:27 pm
Location: Keeper of THE COIN!
Has given High Fives: 1083 times
Received High Fives: 1002 times

Unread post by Willmark »

rcraider wrote: Mon Nov 10, 2025 5:25 pm Actually i think the Colts screwed that whole thing up. They overdrafted a raw as sushi, badly in need of development QB, than in his 1st season they let him run the ball like he is still playing college football against college kids and he predictably gets injured. So his first season ends up being a wash he gets zero development. Enters his 2nd season still raw, gets hurt again - no development. 3rd season still raw, now looks like a bust. They should have been cautious with him and told him you need to protect yourself when you run the ball your big ass is gonna get lit up if you try to take on NFL players, take the safe yardage.
If I was the GM I would have never drafted him in the first place.
User avatar
Oaktown Superman
Posts: 3,039
Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2014 4:02 am
Has given High Fives: 558 times
Received High Fives: 211 times

Unread post by Oaktown Superman »

Hellbound wrote: Mon Nov 10, 2025 9:29 am I get what you're saying and yes kudos for them taking a swing. The thing is, everyone including my wife who doesn't know what a touchdown is, knew Richardson wasn't a qb. He was horrible in college. He had no reason to be drafted before the 5th rd. This isn’t hindsight

Anyways, yes take your swing but don't be absolute idiots about it
QB's like Christian Ponder and EJ Manuel were drafted in the first by teams who needed a QB in a bad way. They didn't pan out, but kudos to them for addressing their need. You miss 100% of the shots you don't take, I think was said by Wayne Gretzky. Chuckles was enamored with Derek Carr for some odd reason, and if he was still coaching the Raiders, DC is still the QB. And that's why the Raiders are in the mess they're in right now. They have neglected the QB position for way too long. And they never tried to adequately address it, but with other team's castoffs.
These users gave a High Five to the author Oaktown Superman for the post:
Swagron
User avatar
rich72
Posts: 8,633
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2014 1:34 pm
Has given High Fives: 665 times
Received High Fives: 353 times

Unread post by rich72 »

rcraider wrote: Mon Nov 10, 2025 5:25 pm Actually i think the Colts screwed that whole thing up. They overdrafted a raw as sushi, badly in need of development QB, than in his 1st season they let him run the ball like he is still playing college football against college kids and he predictably gets injured. So his first season ends up being a wash he gets zero development. Enters his 2nd season still raw, gets hurt again - no development. 3rd season still raw, now looks like a bust. They should have been cautious with him and told him you need to protect yourself when you run the ball your big ass is gonna get lit up if you try to take on NFL players, take the safe yardage.
He was going in the first round anyways, the media was blowing smoke up his ass all season in his rookie year.
User avatar
16 to 88
Posts: 19,162
Joined: Thu May 01, 2014 10:23 pm
Location: Dog House
Has given High Fives: 412 times
Received High Fives: 285 times

Unread post by 16 to 88 »

Still a long ways to go but if we didn't win another game that means we lost to the browns and the giants. I'd be surprised if the saints didn't win another game because they have dates with the falcons, panthers and jets at home and the titans on the road.

So that in turn means we would be in the top 3 along with the titans and the jets. The jets still have the falcons and dolphins at home and the saints on the road. The titans are coming off there bye this week and playing the texans at home. They also are on the road vs. the browns and at home against the saints.
User avatar
rcraider
Posts: 1,028
Joined: Fri Mar 06, 2015 10:46 pm
Has given High Fives: 374 times
Received High Fives: 273 times

Unread post by rcraider »

Interesting, Cam Millers successor at North Dakota St - Cole Payton

User avatar
RunOverByHubbard
Posts: 13,334
Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2013 9:09 am
Location: 88 miles NE of the Coliseum
Has given High Fives: 135 times
Received High Fives: 728 times

Unread post by RunOverByHubbard »

We need a QB in a bad way, but if the one we want is gone, I would take Peter Woods (DT) of Clemson or Francis Mauigoa (OT) of Miami. At this point, they are the two safest choices in the draft for what we need the most-- help on the lines.
These users gave a High Five to the author RunOverByHubbard for the post:
Xramfan
User avatar
Attyla
Gold JacketSnake3 Mile Lyle
Posts: 52,595
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1237 times
Received High Fives: 2965 times

Unread post by Attyla »

RunOverByHubbard wrote: Thu Nov 13, 2025 8:41 am We need a QB in a bad way, but if the one we want is gone, I would take Peter Woods (DT) of Clemson or Francis Mauigoa (OT) of Miami. At this point, they are the two safest choices in the draft for what we need the most-- help on the lines.
Woods is quickly becoming my choice as well.
User avatar
RI RAIDER
Posts: 6,331
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 4:34 am
Has given High Fives: 1066 times
Received High Fives: 585 times

Unread post by RI RAIDER »

DT is the hardest position to fill after QB so I am down with Woods. My nephew goes to Clemson and said Woods has been a huge disappointment this season (for what it is worth). I do like the idea of copying the Giants last draft (getting a stud defender and trading up from the 2nd to get a QB (there is always someone who drops). I am not convinced there is a clear cut #1 stud at QB this season. What looked like a great draft on paper is turning out to be a dog. What does that mean? Nothing.
User avatar
Attyla
Gold JacketSnake3 Mile Lyle
Posts: 52,595
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1237 times
Received High Fives: 2965 times

Unread post by Attyla »

RI RAIDER wrote: Thu Nov 13, 2025 9:37 am DT is the hardest position to fill after QB so I am down with Woods. My nephew goes to Clemson and said Woods has been a huge disappointment this season (for what it is worth). I do like the idea of copying the Giants last draft (getting a stud defender and trading up from the 2nd to get a QB (there is always someone who drops). I am not convinced there is a clear cut #1 stud at QB this season. What looked like a great draft on paper is turning out to be a dog. What does that mean? Nothing.
I don't think Woods has been a disappointment. I think he has not had enough help on the line. When you can double team an interior lineman like teams have been able to do, the problem is not the guy getting the double team.
Post Reply