Fire Patrick Graham

Las Vegas Raiders Discussion.
Born from RF.net ruins, resurrected as RF.com, now arriving at Raiderstation.
The #1 Las Vegas Raiders site on the web!
User avatar
RenoRaiders75
Posts: 1,375
Joined: Sat Apr 29, 2017 8:36 am
Received High Fives: 19 times

Fire Patrick Graham

Unread post by RenoRaiders75 »

We have a fire Chip Kelly thread, why not fire PG? Our D sucks. We couldn't even stop them in the second half. Players are getting burnt. He hasn't really devolped anyone, we have zero pressure except for Maxx and he is being trippled teamed. Anyone else ready to move on?
These users gave a High Five to the author RenoRaiders75 for the post (total 2):
The Real CK, FlyBono24
User avatar
SuperRaider
Posts: 695
Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2024 6:01 am
Location: Belper;UK
Has given High Fives: 61 times
Received High Fives: 194 times

Unread post by SuperRaider »

He probably gone after this season anyway as he was not Pete guy….cannot really fault PG for the defense; when maybe up to 6 or 7 starters left from last season…so the defense is going to be worse…
User avatar
BoKnows81
Bo Knows
Posts: 7,331
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:36 am
Has given High Fives: 930 times
Received High Fives: 2155 times

Unread post by BoKnows81 »

SuperRaider wrote: Tue Nov 04, 2025 5:20 am He probably gone after this season anyway as he was not Pete guy….cannot really fault PG for the defense; when maybe up to 6 or 7 starters left from last season…so the defense is going to be worse…
What you mean he wasn't Pete's guy? Pete retained him!
User avatar
NoClapsPlease
Posts: 9,468
Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2013 3:11 pm
Has given High Fives: 26 times
Received High Fives: 150 times

Unread post by NoClapsPlease »

Raiders were ranked 9th in 2023
19th in 2024

Those are facts, BoKnows

Your post is opinions - very irrelevant opinions

You lower the quality of discussion on here, honestly - because you don’t understand football outside of watching a QB drop back and either complete a pass or miss a pass. That’s the extent of your knowledge of the game and frankly I’m not interested.
These users gave a High Five to the author NoClapsPlease for the post:
andreas9109
User avatar
andreas9109
Posts: 607
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2015 6:38 am
Location: Europe
Has given High Fives: 5 times
Received High Fives: 11 times

Unread post by andreas9109 »

NoClapsPlease wrote: Tue Nov 04, 2025 5:34 am Raiders were ranked 9th in 2023
19th in 2024

Those are facts, BoKnows

Your post is opinions - very irrelevant opinions

You lower the quality of discussion on here, honestly - because you don’t understand football outside of watching a QB drop back and either complete a pass or miss a pass. That’s the extent of your knowledge of the game and frankly I’m not interested.
I belive against the run we had a really good defense during the recent seasons. This year's meltdown is on Pete Carroll and his personal decisions.

Patrick Graham is a good DC (did a very good job at the Giants), he is going to have a DC job anywhere in the league next year. Hating him is stupid.

We don't have coordinator problem, we have roster problem, starting with the QB.
These users gave a High Five to the author andreas9109 for the post:
NoClapsPlease
User avatar
Attyla
Gold JacketSnake3 Mile Lyle
Posts: 52,595
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1235 times
Received High Fives: 2947 times

Unread post by Attyla »

BoKnows81 wrote: Tue Nov 04, 2025 5:23 am What you mean he wasn't Pete's guy? Pete retained him!
I tend to agree that he is not a "Pete guy" in that while he retained him, he probably did not pick him. I think retaining him was more about continuity on the defensive side. He does not typically run the type of defense Pete is known for. I think, and I could be wrong, that they wanted to focus on the offense this year and deal with the defense down the road. And it could simply be Graham had another year or two on his deal and they did not want to pay out yet another empty contract? Just guessing on that part.
User avatar
heavyD
Posts: 8,675
Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2015 6:59 am
Has given High Fives: 179 times
Received High Fives: 454 times

Unread post by heavyD »

I’m sure the defense would have looked a little better if Wilkins didn’t botch his recovery. I’m pretty indifferent to Graham. He’s not a top DC but he’s far from the worst and I still have nightmares about the KNJ and Guenther. There are some really bad NFL defenses this season so you can do a lot worse than Graham. If the Raiders were to move on from him, it in no way guarantees that the defense improves under the next guy. It could get much worse and since Raiders fans can never have nice things, I imagine it will get worse under the next DC. It just seems everybody that joins the organization gets worse at their jobs.
These users gave a High Five to the author heavyD for the post (total 2):
Viper, Curay7680
User avatar
Attyla
Gold JacketSnake3 Mile Lyle
Posts: 52,595
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1235 times
Received High Fives: 2947 times

Unread post by Attyla »

Jeevo wrote: Mon Nov 03, 2025 8:14 pm You can’t make a silk purse out of a sow’s ear.
In 1920 they actually make a silk like purse out of a sow's ear using a process that filtered the ear through a spinneret. However, we are probably mere years from recreating the chemical properties of silk using other materials such as a sow's ear.

Sorry, thought that was interesting.
These users gave a High Five to the author Attyla for the post (total 2):
Jeevo, Opoponax50
User avatar
raiderjohn
Posts: 754
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2014 3:21 pm
Has given High Fives: 1 time
Received High Fives: 118 times

Unread post by raiderjohn »

Graham came in as a 3-4 coach. Never had the chance to run his system.
User avatar
Opoponax50
Posts: 5,707
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2020 9:16 am
Has given High Fives: 1149 times
Received High Fives: 581 times

Unread post by Opoponax50 »

Jeevo wrote: Mon Nov 03, 2025 8:14 pm You can’t make a silk purse out of a sow’s ear.
In this instance I think his time has come and gone. He's had what, 3-4 years to integrate players into his system? Sorry, but that's more than enough time to have your guys executing well and not making third and long a great opportunity for the opposing offense.

It doesn't mean that he wouldn't do better with better players, but things just aren't working out. A good coach gets the most out of their players and even elevates them. Graham isn't doing that.

I don't want to see him let go now, but when the season's over, it's time to get some new blood in the building.
User avatar
Opoponax50
Posts: 5,707
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2020 9:16 am
Has given High Fives: 1149 times
Received High Fives: 581 times

Unread post by Opoponax50 »

NoClapsPlease wrote: Tue Nov 04, 2025 5:34 am Raiders were ranked 9th in 2023
19th in 2024
When it comes to paper stats, I always think of Carr. On paper he looked pretty damn good. On the field, well, we all know what happened there.

He's been here long enough for a fair evaluation and he's just not getting the job done. It's easy to say he needs better players, but the same can be said of every single coach on every team at every level. Good coaching doesn't require having pro bowlers in every group (DL, LB, DB), it means that you're able to get the guys you do have to play to their potential.

Graham isn't doing that.
These users gave a High Five to the author Opoponax50 for the post (total 3):
RickRyb, DeathStar24, mranquales
User avatar
Jeevo
SnakeMad Stork
Posts: 14,860
Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2017 8:24 am
Location: Canada
Has given High Fives: 420 times
Received High Fives: 791 times

Unread post by Jeevo »

Opoponax50 wrote: Tue Nov 04, 2025 7:43 am In this instance I think his time has come and gone. He's had what, 3-4 years to integrate players into his system? Sorry, but that's more than enough time to have your guys executing well and not making third and long a great opportunity for the opposing offense.

It doesn't mean that he wouldn't do better with better players, but things just aren't working out. A good coach gets the most out of their players and even elevates them. Graham isn't doing that.

I don't want to see him let go now, but when the season's over, it's time to get some new blood in the building.
We had a pretty good D a couple of years ago but the talent level has dropped significantly since. I think you’re right though, he’s going to be let go.
User avatar
mranquales
Posts: 8,625
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2014 1:47 pm
Has given High Fives: 889 times
Received High Fives: 278 times

Unread post by mranquales »

Opoponax50 wrote: Tue Nov 04, 2025 7:43 am In this instance I think his time has come and gone. He's had what, 3-4 years to integrate players into his system? Sorry, but that's more than enough time to have your guys executing well and not making third and long a great opportunity for the opposing offense.
That's the part that bothers me about Patrick Graham. If you're defense can't hold on 3rd and 20, then what's the purpose of having you around?

I don't know what the actual data is, but I'm quite certain that the 10+ yards to gain given up percentage is extremely high.
These users gave a High Five to the author mranquales for the post:
The Real CK
User avatar
Attyla
Gold JacketSnake3 Mile Lyle
Posts: 52,595
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1235 times
Received High Fives: 2947 times

Unread post by Attyla »

mranquales wrote: Tue Nov 04, 2025 8:34 am That's the part that bothers me about Patrick Graham. If you're defense can't hold on 3rd and 20, then what's the purpose of having you around?

I don't know what the actual data is, but I'm quite certain that the 10+ yards to gain given up percentage is extremely high.
Actually you are wrong. In 2024 we were third best in third and long and while this year there has been a drop off we are only bottom third.
User avatar
The Real CK
Fernando
Posts: 17,294
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2016 10:37 am
Location: "Only losers qualify for comeback wins."
Has given High Fives: 520 times
Received High Fives: 218 times

Unread post by The Real CK »

Graham's defense had one good stretch in 2023 against backup QBs and that fluke versus KC.

They blew massive leads in 2022, were awful in 2024, and are awful again.

He can leave with Depends at the end of the year.
These users gave a High Five to the author The Real CK for the post (total 3):
mranquales, FlyBono24, Raidersman321
User avatar
BoKnows81
Bo Knows
Posts: 7,331
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:36 am
Has given High Fives: 930 times
Received High Fives: 2155 times

Unread post by BoKnows81 »

The Real CK wrote: Tue Nov 04, 2025 9:04 am Graham's defense had one good stretch in 2023 against backup QBs and that fluke versus KC.

They blew massive leads in 2022, were awful in 2024, and are awful again.

He can leave with Depends at the end of the year.
That sad little troll NoClaps wasn't even worth responding to. He clearly doesn't watch the games with his eyes.
These users gave a High Five to the author BoKnows81 for the post:
The Real CK
Post Reply