Geno Smith Thread
-
BoKnows81
- Posts: 7,339
- Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:36 am
- Has given High Fives: 928 times
- Received High Fives: 2149 times
- LayneStaley
- Posts: 4,456
- Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2018 12:29 pm
- Has given High Fives: 344 times
- Received High Fives: 879 times
It’s been 2 games. Fix the line play and see what happens. I’m not condemning anyone on the offense yet except Parham, he’s dog shit.
- These users gave a High Five to the author LayneStaley for the post (total 2):
- Dr Death, chucker
-
The Real CK
- Posts: 17,301
- Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2016 10:37 am
- Location: "Only losers qualify for comeback wins."
- Has given High Fives: 487 times
- Received High Fives: 201 times
2 TDs and 4 INTs when it matters.
And the franchise extended him.
And the franchise extended him.
- These users gave a High Five to the author The Real CK for the post:
- FlyBono24
- heavyD
- Posts: 8,675
- Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2015 6:59 am
- Has given High Fives: 176 times
- Received High Fives: 445 times
Gino was better today but the stats are a little flattering. He's got to get rid of the ball faster at times as he's taking a few unnecessary sacks. Still this offensive line is one of the worst I have ever seen and Tom Brady in his prime would have some difficulty putting the team in position to win especially when the defense and special teams are trying to rival the OL in futility.
- These users gave a High Five to the author heavyD for the post:
- LayneStaley
- Oaktownonly
- Posts: 3,745
- Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2014 9:32 am
- Has given High Fives: 451 times
- Received High Fives: 439 times
The offensive line absolutely sucks but this guy runs into defenders.
- These users gave a High Five to the author Oaktownonly for the post (total 2):
- The Real CK, RenoRaider
-
The Real CK
- Posts: 17,301
- Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2016 10:37 am
- Location: "Only losers qualify for comeback wins."
- Has given High Fives: 487 times
- Received High Fives: 201 times
He has the pocket presence of Helen Keller.
- These users gave a High Five to the author The Real CK for the post (total 2):
- Dr Death, FlyBono24
-
The Real CK
- Posts: 17,301
- Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2016 10:37 am
- Location: "Only losers qualify for comeback wins."
- Has given High Fives: 487 times
- Received High Fives: 201 times
Credit for what? Throwing picks and taking sacks. Jesse is delusional.Atlasffa wrote: Sun Sep 21, 2025 8:17 pm
November 5 is the trade deadline. Hope they are making a list and checking it at least twice. Need some new blood on that o-line.
- These users gave a High Five to the author The Real CK for the post (total 2):
- FlyBono24, BoKnows81
-
Corleone
- Posts: 20,608
- Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2013 4:37 pm
- Has given High Fives: 161 times
- Received High Fives: 780 times
-
Contact:
Contact Corleone
Last year with Seattle, Geno took 50 sacks (3rd most in the NFL).The Real CK wrote: Sun Sep 21, 2025 8:25 pm Credit for what? Throwing picks and taking sacks. Jesse is delusional.
This year:
Now I realize our OL is trash but Geno is not helping matters, he looks awful.- These users gave a High Five to the author Corleone for the post:
- The Real CK
- Atlasffa
- Posts: 13,148
- Joined: Sun May 01, 2016 7:41 am
- Location: Just Win Baby!
- Has given High Fives: 185 times
- Received High Fives: 754 times
Seattle's situation is different than Raiders. They do not have two and half decades of miserable history. They weren't SB contenders when McDonald took over but they were a winning team. The OL last year was their weakness. PFF ranked Seattle's OL 31st last year, yet they won 10 games despite the 50 sacks. They have a new OL coach this year and made improvements in the OL personnel. Additionally, they are in the second year with their head coach and have continuity in the GM. With a year under their belt, the new regime knew exactly their weaknesses and could draft and acquire FAs accordingly. Raiders were a train wreck last year (and many previous years). PC took over with none of the advantages found in Seattle. It's going to take more than 3 games to mold a winning culture.Corleone wrote: Sun Sep 21, 2025 10:06 pm Last year with Seattle, Geno took 50 sacks (3rd most in the NFL).
This year:
Now I realize our OL is trash but Geno is not helping matters, he looks awful.
-
The Real CK
- Posts: 17,301
- Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2016 10:37 am
- Location: "Only losers qualify for comeback wins."
- Has given High Fives: 487 times
- Received High Fives: 201 times
Not having a quarterback taking avoidable sacks helps more than anything.
No NFL OL in this modern age of pass rushing emphasis can consistently hold blocks for more than 3-4 seconds.
No NFL OL in this modern age of pass rushing emphasis can consistently hold blocks for more than 3-4 seconds.
-
The Real CK
- Posts: 17,301
- Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2016 10:37 am
- Location: "Only losers qualify for comeback wins."
- Has given High Fives: 487 times
- Received High Fives: 201 times
Seattle isn't run by nostalgic fools. The regime quickly realized what they didn't have in Geno (because they didn't listen to Twitter film idiots or melt over Geno's "they wrote me out quotes") and found a sucker in Pete and us to take him over their hands for a pick. When a team jettisons a quarterback from a ten-win team or a "winner" like Jimmy G; buyer beware.Atlasffa wrote: Sun Sep 21, 2025 10:58 pm Seattle's situation is different than Raiders. They do not have two and half decades of miserable history. They weren't SB contenders when McDonald took over but they were a winning team. The OL last year was their weakness. PFF ranked Seattle's OL 31st last year, yet they won 10 games despite the 50 sacks. They have a new OL coach this year and made improvements in the OL personnel. Additionally, they are in the second year with their head coach and have continuity in the GM. With a year under their belt, the new regime knew exactly their weaknesses and could draft and acquire FAs accordingly. Raiders were a train wreck last year (and many previous years). PC took over with none of the advantages found in Seattle. It's going to take more than 3 games to mold a winning culture.
Maybe Darnold doesn't work out in the long run but he didn't cost Seattle a draft pick and they can escape with little cost from his contract.
Meanwhile, we extended Geno for 66 million guaranteed and no other reason than Prostate Pete, being ancient, wanted a known security blanket.
-
Corleone
- Posts: 20,608
- Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2013 4:37 pm
- Has given High Fives: 161 times
- Received High Fives: 780 times
-
Contact:
Contact Corleone
So what you're saying is that the sucessful franchise (with their shit together) chose to trade Geno Smith and sign Sam Darnold, knowing it would be an upgrade that helped their team?Atlasffa wrote: Sun Sep 21, 2025 10:58 pm Seattle's situation is different than Raiders. They do not have two and half decades of miserable history. They weren't SB contenders when McDonald took over but they were a winning team. The OL last year was their weakness. PFF ranked Seattle's OL 31st last year, yet they won 10 games despite the 50 sacks. They have a new OL coach this year and made improvements in the OL personnel. Additionally, they are in the second year with their head coach and have continuity in the GM. With a year under their belt, the new regime knew exactly their weaknesses and could draft and acquire FAs accordingly. Raiders were a train wreck last year (and many previous years). PC took over with none of the advantages found in Seattle. It's going to take more than 3 games to mold a winning culture.- These users gave a High Five to the author Corleone for the post:
- The Real CK
-
Corleone
- Posts: 20,608
- Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2013 4:37 pm
- Has given High Fives: 161 times
- Received High Fives: 780 times
-
Contact:
Contact Corleone
Unless it's the Chargers playing against our OL.The Real CK wrote: Mon Sep 22, 2025 1:35 am Not having a quarterback taking avoidable sacks helps more than anything.
No NFL OL in this modern age of pass rushing emphasis can consistently hold blocks for more than 3-4 seconds.- These users gave a High Five to the author Corleone for the post (total 2):
- The Real CK, powski
- Atlasffa
- Posts: 13,148
- Joined: Sun May 01, 2016 7:41 am
- Location: Just Win Baby!
- Has given High Fives: 185 times
- Received High Fives: 754 times
Geno chose to leave them.Corleone wrote: Mon Sep 22, 2025 2:35 am So what you're saying is that the sucessful franchise (with their shit together) chose to trade Geno Smith and sign Sam Darnold, knowing it would be an upgrade that helped their team?